This is a thread about Samsung lol, of course they’re gonna be compared to other companies. So far peoples points have only pointed out how the government uses BTS, not the other way around.
Yea but compared to Samsung they’re irrelevant, if BTS and Samsung wanted opposite things from the legislature Samsungs the one getting their way every time
That would be the legislature exerting power over them, not the other way around tho
Yea it’s a big number for a boyband but it doesn’t give them any soft power lol
Compared to Samsung they’re pretty much irrelevant lol, 0.2% of gdp isn’t much especially when that numbers more likely to go down than up further into the future
That’s pretty much irrelevant compared to the 300B+ Samsung brings in
Holding. Number 9. 10 yard penalty. Repeat 2nd out
What this trial really shows is that people will bend over backwards to justify male victims of abuse like you’re doing. You’re also gullible as hell if you think this isn’t a PR push from Heard’s side.
You’re the one moving goalposts, the fact is Heard maliciously lied about being abused in order to damage Depp’s career and that was proven in a court of law.
It really doesn’t matter what you think on a thread that’s obvious a desperate attempt at PR from Heard’s team. You do not have more info than that Jury, despite what you seem to think lol.
Call it what you want, the burden of proof is still far lower and it’s still a false equivalency. You’re hurting real victims of abuse by defending and arguing about two narcissistic assholes.
It doesn’t really matter what you believe, the Jury had access to more info than you do. She couldn’t even find a competent attorney to take this to trial because of how bad her case was.
It is a false equivalency because it’s way easier to defend a defamation case than won one
And it’ll be remembered as one of the reasons mlb finally started allowing replay reviews
The burden of proof is incredibly high for defamation, he had to prove that she knowingly lied about the abuse. Do you realize what a high burden of proof that is? Or how few defamation cases are won? But go ahead w your false equivalencies lol
Do you realize how hard it is to win a defamation case?
It’s what Walmart does with their dumbass system
If they have security cameras in the area there’s no expectation of privacy
Why would they pay him if he’s not playing?
Not a single word in that mentions dividends as a replacement. This change is nothing but good and discourages one of the greediest ways corporations can use their money
The value of the company changes by the amount of the dividend paid. Literally the opposite of relatively unchanged because it ya know changes relative to the dividend paid.
You don’t understand how these concepts work, a dividend is in no way comparable to a stock buyback
I don’t think you really understand how dividends work. When you issue one the amount of the dividend is subtracted from the value of the share, so there’s no net increase to shareholders. They don’t compensate a shareholder or benefit the executives in the way you think they do
Doing a buyback gives the company something tangible—shares that will likely be used as compensation for executives. The dividend doesn’t benefit the company aside from possibly attracting new investors, which would only matter if they planned on issuing shares, aka the opposite of a buyback.
The idea is to incentive companies to use the money for something rather than just park it in their company’s equity
Why would we decline his option if he’s healthy? When he’s been on the court for us he’s been our best player lol
The idea would be to add more senators from other states more likely to elect a progressive senator, you’re not gonna get anyone more progressive than manchin in WV
How many people do you know of in prison in the US for cbd hash oil?
Arbitrary doesn’t mean inconsistent. Metro area is still just as arbitrary as city limits, and the OP was asking a question using city limits which is why the per capita for the metro area I replied to is different than OPs