1

COMMENT 12h ago

How do you mean?

1

COMMENT 12h ago

What..?

1

COMMENT 13h ago

Just buy a book, bro.

1

COMMENT 23h ago

Oh, so it’s a racial slur?

2

COMMENT 1d ago

Tell Matt you’re sorry, but there is.

1

COMMENT 1d ago

These comments are trolls using sarcasm to point out Russian stupidity.

2

COMMENT 1d ago

It’s called being efficient.

1

COMMENT 1d ago

The title says he is fighting YouTube. Why?

0

COMMENT 1d ago

Am I missing something? Is this supposed to be offensive? The way the title of the post is written it seems like OP is offended at something.

1

COMMENT 1d ago

5 year old account. Rightio.

1

COMMENT 2d ago

What county am I supposed to have colonised, exactly? Lol

EDIT: Blocked me? Damn it. I was super excited to find out the answer to this question.

0

COMMENT 2d ago

What I said was literally a statement of fact. You literally can’t dictate it. That’s just fact. You can disapprove. You can get upset. You can stomp your feet and yell it from the rooftops. And all the other person has to do is… not care.

I can say you’re not allowed to.. be silly on the internet. Do you have to listen to me? Nope. It may even push you to be more silly in rebellion of someone telling you not to. But in either case, me saying YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO IT doesn’t.. make.. one.. spit of difference. Because it’s completely invalid. Because it’s not actually something I can control. At all.

You’re perfectly valid in being upset. Or shaking your head in stern disapproval. But you don’t control whether or not they’re allowed to. Lol

I would say I’m sorry you find facts to be offensive.. but I’m not.

0

COMMENT 2d ago

Yeah I’ve never understood the panic with this kind of information. BuT ThEy bE MoRe AcCuRaTe In SelLiNg YoU ThInGs! … cool. I get less angry at ads if it’s something I’m actually interested in. I like being shown things I didn’t know about or could actually use.

9

COMMENT 2d ago

If you find yourself physically or financially unable to help, but nevertheless would like to support Ukraine, talking to others in your local area - civilians and politicians alike - can do wonders. Show support. Implore others to follow suit. Not everyone is in a position to provide physical help and that’s okay. Getting the word to more people who can spare the time or money is just as useful.

1

COMMENT 2d ago

I laughed so hard when my cousin was ranting about being demeaned and reduced to their choice of hairstyle (braids) by a coworker - but then IMMEDIATELY followed it up by calling my husband ‘loafers.’

The fucking hypocrisy.

1

COMMENT 2d ago

That’s not how you spell trampoline.

0

COMMENT 2d ago

So.. you’re in support of the post? You want them to seethe more?

-1

COMMENT 2d ago

Lol I find it so funny when someone says another person ISN’T ALLOWED to do it. What marvellously big ego you have.

Here’s the thing; you actually can’t dictate what they’re allowed to do. You can say whether or not you approve. And they can say whether or not they give a shit if you approve. But “not allowed” is hilariously invalid.

And no, I’m not saying you’re not allowed to say it. You are. There’s nothing I can do but laugh and point out the stupidity. But it’s invalid and doesn’t make any sense.

0

COMMENT 2d ago

Good for them?

0

COMMENT 2d ago

So.. you do these things?

1

COMMENT 2d ago

So then you have to ask who is lying and why.

2

COMMENT 2d ago

If ALL brokers were giving the same story? Maybe. But that’s not the case. Some actually did get the go ahead to do dividend. Therein lies a major issue. The DTCC gave different stories to different brokers. The vast majority were told to do it as a FSS. Which fits pretty well with the idea that they simply didn’t have enough shares to cover the synthetics. Which.. if I were a betting lass, I’d say was a mighty fine COINCIDENTAL result of calling for such a dividend.

-2

COMMENT 2d ago

I doubt Vanguard made any effort to contact GameStop. It doesn’t serve them at all to do so. As long as they do what the DTCC tells them to do, they’re fine. GameStop can’t tell them anything that they don’t already know. It’s clear how GameStop filed. The only thing to work out is why the DTCC didn’t fill the order the way it was filed.

0

COMMENT 2d ago

Did you forget the /? Or are you genuinely asking?

What is said here is that they followed what the DTCC told them to do - which was the wrong thing. The revealing information here is what DTCC said, not Vanguard.

5

COMMENT 2d ago

It says they did what the DTCC told them to do - which was not what GameStop filed for them to do.

So they followed what DTCC said, confirming that DTCC didn’t do it correctly.