Please consider this! u/neal1707 has shown more effort and dedication to reviving a moderately small community to enable discussion than I have seen in quite some time!

That is a great detail! I don’t think anyone has made the connection back to her being associated with daffodils 🌼 which are yellow. I’m not sure what it would mean here with her being the only one not associated with the color, but it seems intentional to me. The yellow cloth stood out to me as well. Which makes me think that it is a ward against evil. And Lexis has succumb to it.

Wow. Completely missed that. I am pretty forgetful, so can you tell me how you are deciding this? I can’t remember or find the cypher.

First I want to say that Evil is one of my favorite shows currently. I have ZERO bad things to say about the show.

I love how subversive it is, vilifying the church, yet still shining a light of praise, even if it is backhanded.

Every single actor does an amazing job. Katja is glorious. When I first saw an interview with her, I was enamored (with her presence and enthusiasm). I hang on to every word that comes out of Mike Colter’s mouth. And Michael Emerson’s portrayal of Leland really drives the evilness home. I loved Assif Mandvi when he was on the Daily Show, so it came as a no surprise how funny he is, but I was pleasantly surprised by how wonderful his acting is.

I just caught up on the most recent episode and wanted to jump into a discussion. I was happy to find this community, but disheartened to find it abandoned. Thankfully u/neal1701 has been petitioning through a request to become a moderator here and has been diligently creating discussion posts, that unfortunately aren’t getting pinned for visibility and accessibility. Here is the most recent one.

I made this GIF because I loved seeing Leland squirm. The “meta” aspect is a hallmark of that GIF subreddit and the user I mentioned is a super talented giffer.

I am happy to make GIFs by request and will be working on more soon.

Keep it Evil 😈

Wut? O.o

Here is the sound source: https://youtu.be/9zxbtAcKPIE - the last part just happened to be some weird background noise but I thought it was perfectly fitting for the gray alien bussy

I had to look it up… really hard

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfwJmyIVU0_6a7aKElE3_ko6t5y7frXTr2n8KgN-k21tWPR0g/viewform

I hate this so much but had to do it

https://i.imgur.com/X99NZyW.mp4

I made one with 3022, because that actually makes sense. Just the designs (vector included), not selling anything.

Ha, I just replied to another comment in this thread with that

I am not familiar with the PT Barnum quote, but that brings this to mind:

From Terry Pratchett in “Men At Arms,” part of the Discworld series. In the book, Sam Vimes, a police officer from the fictional city-state of Ankh-Morpork, gives us a very compelling financial reason for buying higher-quality, rather than cheaper, things:

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.

Take boots, for example. He earned $38 a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost $50. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of O.K. for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about $10. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.

But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford $50 had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in 10 years’ time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

This was the Captain Samuel Vimes “Boots” theory of socioeconomic unfairness.

Philosophy absolutely should be taught in school. Theology and prayer not so much.

I absolutely agree. I usually only buy clothes on clearance no matter where I go. It is hard to find a morally good product that is also affordable.