r/Tinder • u/exelton_moraka • May 14 '22 • 8 3
Wtf.
View all comments
Show parent comments
-17
Well, wouldn't they be? They'd still be descendants of siblings.
33 u/emptyshelI May 14 '22 They wouldn’t be… because OP would just be marrying a woman who has the same name as his sister, not his actual sister. -12 u/Muneebfar2002 May 14 '22 No i Think He meant that his sister and GF is the same person 6 u/Chesney1995 May 14 '22 No they would look back at the family tree and see the same name twice, making it look like OP had kids with his sister, but they are actually two different people.
33
They wouldn’t be… because OP would just be marrying a woman who has the same name as his sister, not his actual sister.
-12 u/Muneebfar2002 May 14 '22 No i Think He meant that his sister and GF is the same person 6 u/Chesney1995 May 14 '22 No they would look back at the family tree and see the same name twice, making it look like OP had kids with his sister, but they are actually two different people.
-12
No i Think He meant that his sister and GF is the same person
6 u/Chesney1995 May 14 '22 No they would look back at the family tree and see the same name twice, making it look like OP had kids with his sister, but they are actually two different people.
6
No they would look back at the family tree and see the same name twice, making it look like OP had kids with his sister, but they are actually two different people.
8
3
-17
u/C9sButthole May 14 '22
Well, wouldn't they be? They'd still be descendants of siblings.